Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 6:47:59 GMT
I don't want to talk about the correctness of the language, that is, the knowledge of Italian grammar: that is the basis for being able to write. It's like becoming a doctor without having a medical degree. I therefore also overlook the technical issues relating to creative writing (plot, documentation, etc.), I also overlook a certain experience in writing short stories, stories, which have allowed an author to handle the art of narration and to understand certain mechanisms. Naturally these are also requirements for writing quality stories and being able to sell them, but they are underlying requirements that are assumed to have already been acquired by an author who has decided to publish an ebook.
The strength of the idea In the comments to my article on self-criticism someone spoke in a certain sense about the strength of the idea: if you continue to like that story, it continues to remain in your head even after a long time , then it means that it is valid. Whether it can be liked is another matter, but until a story is published no author can have this certainty. So let's gloss over this point too. Days ago I reread the plot of my science Special Data fiction novel PU and I still like that story, I still want to write it, still work on it, despite knowing that it is complex and will take time. For me that is a valid idea, so for now it exceeds the first requirement for the quality label. Does the UDPD narrative surpass it? I don't know, I want to let some time pass and see if, thinking back to that story, it continues to inspire me, to like it and make me want to fix it.
Salability hypothesis This is difficult to explain. It is a requirement that I consider important, if not fundamental, both if we want to publish the story in self-publishing and if we want to send it to a publisher. In any case, our story must be salable , otherwise there is no point in publishing it. But what exactly does “saleable” mean? There is a niche of readers , however small, who will appreciate that story (for example lovers of steampunk, post-apocalyptic, romance) There is a market for that story , so there is demand for stories like that (for example stories like the Twilight saga or the 50 Shades trilogy) The story fits into a specific social or historical or even simply narrative panorama and can therefore attract the public's attention (for example investigative stories, stories about controversial historical.
The strength of the idea In the comments to my article on self-criticism someone spoke in a certain sense about the strength of the idea: if you continue to like that story, it continues to remain in your head even after a long time , then it means that it is valid. Whether it can be liked is another matter, but until a story is published no author can have this certainty. So let's gloss over this point too. Days ago I reread the plot of my science Special Data fiction novel PU and I still like that story, I still want to write it, still work on it, despite knowing that it is complex and will take time. For me that is a valid idea, so for now it exceeds the first requirement for the quality label. Does the UDPD narrative surpass it? I don't know, I want to let some time pass and see if, thinking back to that story, it continues to inspire me, to like it and make me want to fix it.
Salability hypothesis This is difficult to explain. It is a requirement that I consider important, if not fundamental, both if we want to publish the story in self-publishing and if we want to send it to a publisher. In any case, our story must be salable , otherwise there is no point in publishing it. But what exactly does “saleable” mean? There is a niche of readers , however small, who will appreciate that story (for example lovers of steampunk, post-apocalyptic, romance) There is a market for that story , so there is demand for stories like that (for example stories like the Twilight saga or the 50 Shades trilogy) The story fits into a specific social or historical or even simply narrative panorama and can therefore attract the public's attention (for example investigative stories, stories about controversial historical.